Welcome to the online Jewish Homeland!

J Street U Director Responds to Berkeley Ban

By Jspace Staff on 12/13/2011 at 12:47 PM

Categories: United States, Religion

J Street U Director Responds to Berkeley Ban

Many in the Jewish community have rallied around J Street after the University of California at Berkeley’s Jewish Student Union decided to deny the organization’s college branch, J Street U, membership last November.

Most recently, the directors of Berkeley Hillel are now calling for the Jewish Student Union to change its mind and admit the organization.

"We respect the right of the Jewish Student Union, an organization sponsored by UC Berkeley student government, to make its own decisions, but we encourage JSU to reconsider its vote and include J Street U as a member," wrote the Hillel’s leaders in a letter.

J Street U was founded two years ago and has 32 chapters across the country. Much like its parent organization, J Street U says on its website that it works to ensure “peace, security and social justice in Israel, the future state of Palestine and across the Middle East.”

However, many of J Street's activities often draw the ire of those who views the organization as anti-Israel, with some even saying that it works to undermine the Jewish state.

Still, the Jewish Student Union vote on November 16 was the first time J Street U had ever been denied membership by a student organization.

J Street U Director Daniel May spoke with Jspace News about the recent show of support for his organization, which includes articles written by notable Jewish columnists Jeffrey Goldberg and Bradley Burston.

“I think it shows that there is broad understanding within the Jewish American community that if the only acceptable way to support Israel is to support every policy of the Israeli government then significant numbers of young people are simply not going to engage,” May said.

He added, “It just shows that even among those who don’t agree with the policies of J Street, there is an understanding that there has to be place within the Jewish community for people who are concerned about what’s happening to Palestinians. If there isn’t, then we’re just narrowing the support for Israel on college campuses. That’s not in the Jewish community’s interests and that’s not in Israel’s interests.”

When asked about a quote from a Berkeley student who voted against J Street U’s membership and then called J Street anti-Israel, May said that such claims are “preposterous.”

“We are an organization dedicated to the democratic Jewish homeland that is Israel. We advocate on behalf of Israel against those that are attacking its core existence … The people who make that argument are trying to define what it means to be pro-Israel in a way that’s not in the interest of Israel or the pro-Israel community,” he said. “You may not agree with J Street, but to somehow paint us as anti-Israel is factually inaccurate, and frankly I think it just shows a kind of intellectually laziness that is apparent on the extremes on both sides. Given that such slander reflects an unwillingness to engage on actual substance, such an accusation does not cast a favorable light on those that spread it.”

May believes that one only needs to have a conversation with J Street U’s student participants to see where the organization’s focus truly is.

“The majority of J Street U leaders are day school kids deeply immersed in the Jewish community. They simply cannot, with a straight face, be described as anything other than deeply committed to Israel and its future,” May said. “The first thing I would ask of someone who makes such a claim is that they simply have a conversation with any of the hundreds of students organizing with J Street U.”

Comments

Eitan - איתן‎ Nidam
Eitan - איתן‎ Nidam 12/13/2011 at 1:34pm
Congratulations to Berkeley’s Jewish Student Union for standing up to J street! Thank you for doing what is right!
Eitan - איתן‎ Nidam
Eitan - איתן‎ Nidam 12/13/2011 at 1:25pm
J Street = the enemy from within

don't air out dirty laundry in public!

Watch Alan Dershowitz crush Jeremy Ben-Ami in a debate - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AReBKzAVaNw

LIKE Jstreet Does not represent me - http://www.facebook.com/StopjStreet

Israeli leaders have said over and over that J Street is not a pro Israel Org.

"They're not pro-Israel, they're not liberally Jewish. They're anti-Israel," MK Yuli Edelstein

Jstreet has been lobbying against the Israeli government positions on many issues as well as supported the goldstone report.

I am happy to see support dwindling and await the day they are completely irrelevant!
Ari Berkowicz
Ari Berkowicz 12/13/2011 at 1:15pm
J Street, while technically paying lip service to the two-state solution, never actually advocates for Israel's best interests and severely harms the Jewish state. J Street includes among its members, supporters, and funders, many rabidly anti-Israel figures who actively and publicly seek Israel's demise (i.e. George Soros and leaders of the Boycott-Divestment-Sanctions movement). For these and several other reasons, J Street certainly lies beyond the pale of what constitutes 'pro-Israel' or Zionist.

AIPAC, long the voice of pro-Israel American Jewry, has consistently supported a strong, bipartisan, bilateral friendship between Israel and America. AIPAC is a very inclusive organization and allows for Israel supporters of all stripes to participate in its programming and lobbying. Despite J Street's claims that it is 'to the right,' most AIPAC supporters have championed the two-state solution for many years. Although its members and leaders include people of different political orientations, the majority of AIPAC members support the notion of a Palestinian state and have for some time. AIPAC is a big tent and does not stifle dissent or left-leaning opinions, as J Street would have you believe. It is simply a mechanism for American Jews to speak with a unified voice in general support of Israel and a strong U.S.-Israel relationship.

Given that AIPAC supporters generally believe that Israel should yield land for peace and that the Arabs should be entitled to a 'Palestinian' state between the Jordan and the Mediterranean, what exactly does J Street bring to the table that AIPAC doesn't? Aside from vicious anti-Zionist funders like George Soros, J Street also brings a brand of 'Israel advocacy' that seems to include everything except any actual pro-Israel message.

Examples:

1. J Street would not condemn the UN's Goldstone Report after the recent Gaza War, which was pilloried by all mainstream pro-Israel organizations for its obvious anti-Israel bias and which equated Hamas terrorism with IDF military responses: http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/10/j_street_progoldstone_antiisra.asp

2. J Street supports the lifting of the Israeli Gaza blockade on dangerous materials, despite clear evidence that ending the blockade would endanger Israeli civilians. Also, J Street would not support or speak out for Israel after the Turkish flotilla incident in the face of worldwide condemnation, despite clear video evidence that Israel acted ethically and legally against violent activists who sought to break Israel's legitimate wartime blockade: http://jstreet.org/gaza-flotilla/#onepager

3. J Street initially opposed economic sanctions on Iran to halt its nuclear program and was one of the last Jewish organizations to endorse even the weakest of sanctions. J Street continues to pressure the U.S. (and consequently, the Israeli) government to leave any military option off the table, even if a nuclear Iran becomes imminent and directly threatens Israel's survival: http://blogs.jta.org/politics/article/2009/09/18/1007990/zoa-shock-and-dismay-that-j-street-apn-oppose-iran-sanctions

4. J Street allowed its campus chapters of J Street U to drop the term 'pro-Israel' from promotional materials and official slogans for fear that it would alienate potential members and because it made current members uncomfortable. I wonder why: http://www.jpost.com/home/article.aspx?id=158660

5. J Street supports the involvement of Hamas in the peace process, despite the terrorist group's total commitment to the annihilation of Israel: http://jstreet.org/policy/issues/hamas-and-palestinian-reconciliation/

6. J Street supported the condemnation of Israel in a recent UN Security Council vote: http://www.standwithus.com/app/inews/view_n.asp?ID=1738

7. J Street convention speakers have included supporters of Boycott-Divestment-Sanctions tactics against Israel and the group will only offer very lukewarm disagreement with such tactics: http://www.worldjewishdaily.com/jstreet-real-face.php

The most sinister aspect of J Street is arguably its 'pro-Israel, pro-peace' slogan. Not only is the group largely funded and supported by extreme leftists who actually hate Israel and remain committed to its destruction, this slogan implies that other supporters of Israel are 'anti-peace.' I may have a pro-Israel opinion that is right of center, but I certainly hope and pray for peace at the conclusion of this conflict. To insinuate that those who don't conform to J Street's narrow, anti-Zionist view of the conflict are not "pro-peace" is insulting and intellectually dishonest. What reasonable person doesn't want to see peace in that part of the world someday?

American Jews may be liberal on American politics, but J Street doesn't represent some sort of magical American Jewish consensus on Israel. With the exception of those Jews on the fringe, Marxist left, few Jews who truly care about and support Israel would ever consider supporting such a dangerous and radical group. The only way J Street is able to differentiate itself from the truly mainstream AIPAC is by taking anti-Israel and/or pro-Palestinian positions on all conflicts and matters of substance (i.e. Goldstone, the flotilla, Iran, the UN Security Council, settlements, Jerusalem, Breaking the Silence, etc.).

AIPAC supports Israel. J Street supports the strong-arming of the Israeli government by extremely liberal American Jews, many of whom have never even been to Israel. Why should American Jews (or any foreigners, for that matter) be allowed to dictate the domestic policy of a sovereign, democratic state? Israel democratically elected Netanyahu and a center-right coalition in the most open and free elections in the Middle East. Why should a gang of extremist Jews be allowed to abrogate the will of the Israeli electorate?

Excuse my bluntness, but nothing that J Street does is good for Israel. It splinters the American Jewish community's support for Israel, takes anti-Israel positions under the guise of being 'pro Israel, pro peace,' and pressures the American government to force Israel to make wrong-headed concessions against the will of its citizens. Why should a group like this be allowed into the Zionist camp? No umbrella should extend that far.